Police Work, Politics and World Affairs, Football and the ongoing search for great Scotch Whiskey!

Friday, September 23, 2016

Another reason I would never live or work in California....

I've often said you couldn't pay me enough to work in California as a cop. In many areas the cost of living is ridiculous, the schools suck, the state government is spending money almost as badly as the Congress and the local politicians are often happy as hell to destroy any cop who takes an action. Case in point.
Los Angeles Police Commission Tells Officers to Run Away, or Else

Run away. If a police officer is confronted by a suspect with a weapon, those entrusted to set policies for the Police Department believe officers should run away. That’s the recent finding from the Los Angeles Police Commission which has turned Monday morning quarterbacking into a weekly agenda item at the three-ring circus they preside over every Tuesday morning.

In the Commission’s most recent decision on an officer-involved shooting, in which a suspect charged at two officers swinging an 8 to 9-inch knife, they faulted the officer for not “redeploying” to “create distance.” In plain English: the officer didn’t run away.

The key facts in this case are not in dispute. A female suspect, armed with an 8 to 9-inch knife, charged at officers, repeatedly ignored commands to stop, and was recorded yelling “shoot me” as she swung her knife from side to side.

The armed suspect quickly closed the gap between her knife and the police officers from 70 feet to less than 5 feet in under 10 seconds. That is when the first officer discharged his service weapon. The second officer involved had only three seconds to respond to the imminent threat. Even the Commission stated that “It was reasonable for Officer C to believe, in the moment when the use of force occurred, that the subject would imminently assault him with the knife.”

So where’s the beef?

The officers didn’t run away. The Commission, armed with video and their own political agenda broke down the footage frame by frame to determine that in the course of seconds, the first officer whose “position initially provided Officer C with a position of tactical advantage” lost the advantage as the suspect charged him. They wrote, “this advantage rapidly diminished as the Subject continued her advance, leaving him with neither distance nor effective cover as the Subject approached the space between two parked vehicles by which Officer C was located.”

Suspect charging from the front. Vehicles on either side. Where do you “redeploy?” Run backwards. This is absurd and it’s dangerous. What happens if the officer loses his footing with a charging suspect? What happens if the suspect runs into a nearby home or store and confronts its occupants with her weapon? What if the suspect also had a concealed gun? What is created when an officer turns tail and runs away is a large target. It’s called a back. The officer would put their lives in further jeopardy by running away if the suspect had a gun. At this close range, running away would create a self-caused danger to the officers and the public...

So I could see what we were talking about I checked out the YouTube video of the shooting.

OK, in 8 seconds (21 to 29) she closes the distance to the officers with an eight inch knife in her hands, while being order to stop by a man with a pistol pointed at her. The officer was blocked between three vehicles and could not easily retreat. He was in a position where he had reasonable fear for life or serious bodily injury, so yes, he could use deadly force.

Sorry the lady is gone, but mental illness is not a license to kill others. I've been Crisis Intervention trained since 2000 and I've had multiple refresher courses since then. Sometimes the techniques do not work and you are left with this.

But don't worry, the civilian sitting on their asses second guessing every decision you had to make instantly...they know best.


No comments:

Post a Comment