I recently read the final report of the Presidential Task Force on 21st Century Policing (I have insomnia and it's a sure cure) and I love the lecturing of these lawyers who have never enforced the law and the bureaucrats in uniform tell cop how he is doing wrong. The cop on the scene. Trying to instantly restore order to a situation that took years to deteriorate. Where there is not functioning family to handle the issue. While outnumbered 5-10 to 1. And people are pissed off and you, the cop, are the intruder.
And we need to be taught "De-escalation."
Must be nice in your air-conditioned office.
I'll go on a tear on the TF report in a future post, I have a lot to criticize. But I found this interesting. Emphasis mine.
It’s Citizens; Not Police Who Need De-escalation TrainingI would have one question. What "De-escalation" technique would have stopped Micah Xavier Johnson, the radicalized black nationalist, from murdering 5 cops. Seeing he apparently had other things on this mine?
Ron Martinelli, Ph.D., CMI-V Copyright © July 15, 2016
In the wake of the officer-involved shootings of Philando Castile (St. Paul, MN), Alton Sterling(Baton Rouge, LA) and most recently the assassination of five Dallas, Texas officers; I have been doing non-stop interviews with reporters from the national and international news media.
A number of these journalists have been asking me about the de-escalation training I produce for law enforcement. They ask what the “de-escalation” concept refers to and how it works. They ask, “Shouldn’t the police be getting more de-escalation training?” While I generally respond that it is always a good idea that street officers receive more training; I have taken a different view that I’ll share with you. If you agree with me, I hope that you will share this article with others you know; especially the news media and detractors of law enforcement...
...Our educated law enforcement community – In the United States today, we have never seen a more diverse, better educated, well trained and technologically advanced law enforcement community. Police academies today are more like mini-universities; all accredited through community colleges, where officers receive undergraduate credits for course work.A lot of junior colleges offer criminal justice majors, after two years you can get an associates in CJ with a state peace officer's license. Take that and you can get hired by a local agency. In Texas the basic requirement for a peace officer's license is 60 hours of college and in many larges agencies bachelor's or graduate degrees are common. And we can see the handwriting on the wall, at some point we can see a four year degree as a basic requirement.
In most states police recruits study and are tested in over forty-three separate topics of instruction during an intense six-month academy. During this period, they must demonstrate written and physical/practical competency with a minimum passing score of between 80% to 100% in all subjects. Cultural and sexual diversity, tactical communication, laws of arrest/search and seizure; civil rights, victimology, preliminary investigations, forensics; mental health, drug influence; traffic enforcement and investigations; physical training and use of force/deadly force comprise just a few of the many subjects covered. This level and time compression of education and training is far more demanding; and more intellectually and physically challenging than any university I am aware of....
The reason that police academies are far more demanding than universities is because police officers must deal daily with the real and not theoretical difficulties, challenges and life risks of society. Officers are trained to respond to and often make split-second life and death decisions under circumstances that the U.S. Supreme Court has described as “rapidly evolving, tense and uncertain.” 1That is the beginning. Again, in Texas, all active peace officers must have 40 hours of training every two years and my agency requires 40 hours a year. And it's rare I don't go to class over 100 hours a year, not counting online instruction required by the department, etc. Plus, as you advance, there is leadership training for sergeants, lieutenants, etc.
The police academy is just the beginning of a probationary officer’s training experience. After the police academy, comes a three to four-month Field Training Program, where recruits are intensely supervised by personal Field Training Officers (FTO’s) and evaluated each day on over thirty separate codified police practices. After the FTO program, police recruits are shadowed on their calls for another six months before being considered as a “solo beat officer.” Police recruits also undergo a probationary period of from one to two years before being accepted as fully certified officers.
Police vs. the public’s education – Now let’s compare the education and training that police officers receive to that of some in the general public; including politicians, the liberal media and Black Lives Matter movement who enjoy chastising and criticizing police officers.No, these people went to college so they know the law and their rights. Hey, they watch YouTube and Law and Order.
In the U.S., civil rights are generally not a topic of discussion in middle school and are barely covered in high school. Rather, students learn about civil rights leaders and perhaps their First Amendment rights of freedoms of speech and assembly. Fourth Amendment rights pertaining to law enforcement encounters, detentions, arrests, searches and seizures are almost never covered. Appropriate behavior during police encounters, the rule of law and police practices are rarely if ever covered unless one takes a constitutional law class in college or a university.
Nearly every university professor I am acquainted with who teaches constitutional law, has little to no idea how police officers are trained. They lack an understanding in the legal concepts of an officer’s “collective knowledge.” They generally misunderstand the standards of proof officers rely upon to stop/detain, investigate, search and/or arrest such as reasonable suspicion and probable cause. They know very little about federal case law standards of police practices. This becomes evident when I am asked to step into their classrooms to teach these concepts and I quiz their university “scholar” students in Master’s degree programs. This is disgraceful and a true disservice to American society.At a homicide scene a 17 year old, after calling for an ambulance, called his brother and the brother said, "I'm calling our lawyer..." A couple of hours later a lady shows up and demands to see the 17 year old. We explained to her, "Ma'am, he has not requested to see an attorney and as of right now, he is not subject to custodial interrogation, he is being detained as a witness..." The lady continued to argue and another officer asked her, "Are you a defense attorney?" No, she was a real estate attorney. I have a joke that the last person you want to ask about the law is a lawyer, but it's only slightly facetious. Most lawyers do not practice criminal law and their knowledge is somewhat limited in the field (e.g. ruling in search and seizure, etc).
Who really needs the training? I have come to the conclusion that it is generally not the police who need more training including “de-escalation,” diversity, sensitivity and civil rights training; it is the American public. The Millennium Generation has absolutely no understanding of what their actual civil rights are – and more importantly, are not. They have no idea what the legal constraints are with respect to their behaviors during police encounters. They have no awareness as to why they get detained and arrested for the stupid things they say and do. Most of their parents are worse than their offspring are.I would put as an aside, people like this are not "raised," i.e. they don't have parents rearing them. No one has disciplined them over the years and no one can tell them "no" because they "know their rights!"
Young people and most adults have no understanding of how police officers are trained and how that training combined with their non-compliant, suspicious, potentially threatening and/or active physical resistance become part of the calculus of the peaceful, or defensively forceful response by police their actions precipitate. 1 Case Cite – Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989)
A simple rule to live or die by – Literally every so-called “controversial,” high-profile officer- involved death case bears example of this one simple fact. People who don’t make stupid life decisions; are compliant with police when contacted; and who don’t resist detention or arrest; almost never have problems with police; or end up hospitalized or in a morgue. It’s just that simple. Want some contemporary examples to prove this simple rule? Do the names Michael Brown, Freddie Gray and Anton Sterling sound familiar? They should. Five Dallas officers ultimately lost their lives last week because of the general public’s self-centered, brazen ignorance.
Sensitivity training – It takes a special person to risk their life for those who care so little. Police officers are not your lackeys. They are not separate from you. They are you. They come from your communities. They are your former or current classmates; your friends; your relatives. Police do not create society’s problems; they respond to them. People create society’s problems they consistently make stupid life decisions. Young men impregnate teenage girls because they are selfish, insensitive and controlling. They abandon their children for the same reasons. Teens cut and drop out of school because they are too weak; and/or because their father figures abandoned them. Some teens join gangs and/or take drugs for the same reasons.I have little tolerance for sensitivity training, etc. I find it often tries to divide people into blocks and then pit them against each other. If one of my officer's is in a shootout, that becomes my shootout. And it will be not matter was his race, sex, or orientation is. The only color is blue.
Young men and women poison their own people with drugs and sentence them to a life of addiction because they have no moral compass. Young men pack guns; rob people; invade their homes and kill each other for all of the above reasons. Young men create genocide within their own communities, knowing that everything they do is criminal and physically and emotionally harmful. It is the public and not the police who need sensitivity training. The police are the sensitive ones.See my comments earlier about people not being raised. A child is not something you can give birth to and 18 years later hug on their graduation. It takes time, commitment, money, etc. The child is not a part of a parent's life, they are the parent's life. Too many people today are letting the streets raise their children. And it shows with homicide rates, rape numbers, etc.
Police come into depressed, violent, hopeless communities to save people from themselves. And as thanks for risking their lives; they are then chastised, criticized, demeaned, shot in the back and killed for their efforts by cowards who resonate with the false narratives of radical groups who seek to overthrow the rule of law.
De-escalation training – Police learn that they cannot control people; they can only control themselves. They practice de-escalation training not because they are the ones who need to calm down; but because the people they encounter are often angry, enraged, demented, psychologically unstable, under the influence of illegal drugs, hateful; and/or all of the above.
The general public believe that they have rights that they don’t have. They think and often tell police that they have no right to stop them for a traffic violation; detain them for suspicion of criminal activity; or when police try to intervene when they are unstable, drug influenced, or suicidal. People pack guns; they move menacingly at officers with weapons when repeatedly ordered at TASER® or gun point not to. They provoke officers by compressing time and distance. They verbally or by gestures threaten to beat, stab, shoot and kill officers. Then when force is used against them; they or their surviving relatives sue “to get paid.”
And I'll add egged on and hoping to be the next YouTube sensation. Not to mention these people are acting like this is the new rage in law enforcement. I was taught this in my academy 18 years ago and it's common sense, controlling people with words first then other options.
Where is the support for police? What is far worse emotionally and psychologically for police officers when they are forced to use force and perhaps take a life, is that the uninformed media lines up to support the suspect instead of the police without any forensic facts or evidence that the police did anything wrong. They would rather believe the deliberate lies of Black Lives Matter; race baiter charlatans like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton; or our racially biased; forked- tongued President that it was the police’s fault – the “police acted stupidly.” The media has gotten the forensic facts of deadly police-citizen encounters wrong time and time again. Professor Gates, Michael Brown, Tamir Rice, Freddie Gray and scores more case like them. And our naïve, uninformed, low-informed and disengaged public just mindlessly follows along.
There is never an apology or even a concession to police that the media, race baiters, or the Black Lives Matter surrogates were wrong. That’s not the way the “New America” works these days. No, today it’s all about #journalism instead of vetted, investigative reporting. It’s all about assigning blame rather than accepting responsibility for a wrong-doing. That’s the do-nothing, bring nothing to the table, cowardly society police are forced to work with. It is far easier to yell, scream and criticize the brave men and women of law enforcement than to put on a badge and police their own troubled, violent communities. That seems to be beneath them.
The public’s paradigm shift – The simple fact is that it is the public who needs de-escalation training. They need to calm down and have a studied response instead of emotionally charged reaction to the police they encounter during pedestrian stops, vehicle pull-overs, and investigative contacts. They need to know that a court of law and not the street is the venue for arguing the justification of a stop or an enforcement action. They need to know that no matter how much they might dislike the police; or the reason(s) for being contacted by them; they are legally obligated to obey an officer(s)’ directions, orders, or commands. The public needs to learn how to listen and not argue with police. They need to learn how to temper their behavior and not make stupid, threatening, and potentially deadly bad decisions. Essentially, they need to learn to grow up and mind their manners.
While this may certainly be a “free” society; that freedom is conditional upon obeying the law and it’s hard to argue an opposing view from behind bars, from a hospital bed, or from the morgue.
Mark Levin refers to the "civil society" and how it's broken down over the last few decades. Until we start to disciple and raise children again, we will have more issues like this.
Dr. Ron MartinelliExcellent post sir.
Ron Martinelli, Ph.D., CMI-V, is a nationally renowned forensic criminologist, police expert and a Certified Medical Investigator, who directs the nation’s only multidisciplinary Forensic Death Investigations amp; Independent Review Team. Dr. Martinelli, is the author of the new best-selling book, “The Truth Behind the Black Lives Matter Movement and the War on Police,” His forensic site is www.DrRonMartinelli.com